linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 0/5] dt: unittest: fix breakage and warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150328025503.814D4C40B5F@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:55:03 -0700
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To:	frowand.list@...il.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/5] dt: unittest: fix breakage and warnings

On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:25:51 -0700
, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
 wrote:
> Running checkpatch on early versions of my patchset to fix the devicetree
> make dependency issues exposed a large number of warnings, including some that
> are actual bugs.  http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1503.1/03335.html
> 
> These patches fix those bugs, and another bug exposed by fixing those bugs.
> As a result, the number of tests completed increased from 102 to 107.
> 
> Since I was already poking around, I fixed a few classes of checkpatch warnings.
> 
> There are still plenty of warnings, but the noise is greatly reduced and future
> checkpatch warnings that are problems should stand out more clearly.

Thanks for rooting these out. I'll apply the bug fix for v4.0, and the
rest for v4.1

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/