[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201503280335.16280.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 03:35:15 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board
On Thursday 26 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very nice,
> >> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.
> >
> > drivers/platform/arm ?
> Most certainly.
>
> I'll submit that to drivers/platform/arm/pxa, and maintain that pxa tree. As for
> drivers/platform/arm, do you want also maintainers to step up, or will you take
> the review/merge burden ?
>
I'd much prefer not to add drivers/platform/arm, which would make it too easy
to add random stuff there. What is the problem with leaving it in mach-pxa?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists