linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: avoid recopying file names in getname

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150329152351.GC1477@fixme-laptop>
Date:	Sun, 29 Mar 2015 23:23:51 +0800
From:	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: avoid recopying file names in getname_flags

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
> > Ping.
> >
> > This patch has been tested by 0day test bot.
> 
> I hope you did more than build test this patch...

I did, I boot the new kernel and ran some scripts for creating and
deleting files with various name lengths. Any suggestions for tests,
considering the corner cases are very long file names? Thank you.

For 0day testing bot, I was told that it will run booting and other
test cases, but if there is no error, it won't report. I haven't
received an error report yet since three days before.

Regards,
Boqun

> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> //richard

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped