linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] lib: bitmap_[empty,full]: remove code duplication

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 29 Mar 2015 05:03:55 +0300
From:	Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To:	linux@...izon.com, klimov.linux@...il.com,
	linux@...musvillemoes.dk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	yury.norov@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] lib: bitmap_[empty,full]: remove code duplication

Function 'bitmap_empty' has it's own implementation.
But it's clearly as simple as:
	"find_first_bit(src, nbits) == nbits"
The same is true for 'bitmap_full'.
---
 include/linux/bitmap.h |  8 ++++----
 lib/bitmap.c           | 30 ------------------------------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bitmap.h b/include/linux/bitmap.h
index be4fa5d..ea17cca 100644
--- a/include/linux/bitmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/bitmap.h
@@ -283,16 +283,16 @@ static inline int bitmap_empty(const unsigned long *src, unsigned nbits)
 {
 	if (small_const_nbits(nbits))
 		return ! (*src & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(nbits));
-	else
-		return __bitmap_empty(src, nbits);
+
+	return find_first_bit(src, nbits) == nbits;
 }
 
 static inline int bitmap_full(const unsigned long *src, unsigned int nbits)
 {
 	if (small_const_nbits(nbits))
 		return ! (~(*src) & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(nbits));
-	else
-		return __bitmap_full(src, nbits);
+
+	return find_first_zero_bit(src, nbits) == nbits;
 }
 
 static inline int bitmap_weight(const unsigned long *src, unsigned int nbits)
diff --git a/lib/bitmap.c b/lib/bitmap.c
index d456f4c1..64c0926 100644
--- a/lib/bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/bitmap.c
@@ -42,36 +42,6 @@
  * for the best explanations of this ordering.
  */
 
-int __bitmap_empty(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int bits)
-{
-	unsigned int k, lim = bits/BITS_PER_LONG;
-	for (k = 0; k < lim; ++k)
-		if (bitmap[k])
-			return 0;
-
-	if (bits % BITS_PER_LONG)
-		if (bitmap[k] & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(bits))
-			return 0;
-
-	return 1;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bitmap_empty);
-
-int __bitmap_full(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int bits)
-{
-	unsigned int k, lim = bits/BITS_PER_LONG;
-	for (k = 0; k < lim; ++k)
-		if (~bitmap[k])
-			return 0;
-
-	if (bits % BITS_PER_LONG)
-		if (~bitmap[k] & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(bits))
-			return 0;
-
-	return 1;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bitmap_full);
-
 int __bitmap_equal(const unsigned long *bitmap1,
 		const unsigned long *bitmap2, unsigned int bits)
 {
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/