[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150329230211.GA5145@kernel>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:02:11 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14] sched/deadline: support dl task migration during cpu
hotplug
Ping Ingo, ;)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 07:08:35AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>I observe that dl task can't be migrated to other cpus during cpu hotplug,
>in addition, task may/may not be running again if cpu is added back. The
>root cause which I found is that dl task will be throtted and removed from
>dl rq after comsuming all budget, which leads to stop task can't pick it up
>from dl rq and migrate to other cpus during hotplug.
>
>The method to reproduce:
>schedtool -E -t 50000:100000 -e ./test
>Actually test is just a simple for loop. Then observe which cpu the test
>task is on.
>echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/online
>
>This patch adds the dl task migration during cpu hotplug by finding a most
>suitable later deadline rq after dl timer fire if current rq is offline,
>if fail to find a suitable later deadline rq then fallback to any eligible
>online cpu in order that the deadline task will come back to us, and the
>push/pull mechanism should then move it around properly.
>
>Suggested-and-acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
>Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
>---
>v13 -> 14:
> * have better naming
> * simply the BUG_ON part
>v12 -> 13:
> * move hotplug stuff to CONFIG_SMP in order to fix the error reported by kbuild test robot
>v11 -> v12:
> * s/WARN_ON/BUG_ON
>v10 -> v11:
> * fix codes comments
> * tsk_cpus_allowed(p) shouldn't be on separate lines
> * introduce a helper function to fold dl task migration during cpu hotplug support
>v9 -> v10:
> * fix the "WARNING: line over 80 characters"
> * handle no admission control
>v8 -> v9:
> * align tsk_cpus_allowed(p) to cpu_active_mask
> * add WARN_ON(1)
> * don't resched_curr if later_rq come from the cpumask_any_and()
>v7 -> v8:
> * remove rd->span related modification since Pang's commit 16b269436b72
> (sched/deadline: Modify cpudl::free_cpus to reflect rd->online) merged
> upstream, which Juri pointed out can handle the exclusive cpusets.
> * rebase
>v6 -> v7:
> * rebase
>v5 -> v6:
> * add double_lock_balance in the fallback path
>v4 -> v5:
> * remove raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)
> * cleanup codes, spotted by Peterz
> * cleanup patch description
>v3 -> v4:
> * use tsk_cpus_allowed wrapper
> * fix compile error
>v2 -> v3:
> * don't get_task_struct
> * if cannot preempt any rq, fallback to pick any online cpus
> * use cpu_active_mask as original later_mask if cpu is offline
>v1 -> v2:
> * push the task to another cpu in dl_task_timer() if rq is offline.
>
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>index 24c18dc..12eb314 100644
>--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>@@ -218,6 +218,52 @@ static inline void set_post_schedule(struct rq *rq)
> rq->post_schedule = has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq);
> }
>
>+static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq);
>+
>+static void dl_task_offline_migration(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>+{
>+ struct rq *later_rq = NULL;
>+ bool fallback = false;
>+
>+ later_rq = find_lock_later_rq(p, rq);
>+
>+ if (!later_rq) {
>+ int cpu;
>+
>+ /*
>+ * If we cannot preempt any rq, fall back to pick any
>+ * online cpu.
>+ */
>+ fallback = true;
>+ cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
>+ if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
>+ /*
>+ * Fail to find any suitable cpu.
>+ * The task will never come back!
>+ */
>+ BUG_ON(dl_bandwidth_enabled());
>+
>+ /*
>+ * If admission control is disabled we
>+ * try a little harder to let the task
>+ * run.
>+ */
>+ cpu = cpumask_any(cpu_active_mask);
>+ }
>+ later_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>+ double_lock_balance(rq, later_rq);
>+ }
>+
>+ deactivate_task(rq, p, 0);
>+ set_task_cpu(p, later_rq->cpu);
>+ activate_task(later_rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
>+
>+ if (!fallback)
>+ resched_curr(later_rq);
>+
>+ double_unlock_balance(rq, later_rq);
>+}
>+
> #else
>
> static inline
>@@ -536,6 +582,17 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
> sched_clock_tick();
> update_rq_clock(rq);
>
>+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>+ /*
>+ * If we find that the rq the task was on is no longer
>+ * available, we need to select a new rq.
>+ */
>+ if (unlikely(!rq->online)) {
>+ dl_task_offline_migration(rq, p);
>+ goto unlock;
>+ }
>+#endif
>+
> /*
> * If the throttle happened during sched-out; like:
> *
>--
>1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists