[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5518A023.1040300@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:00:19 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, record: Add clockid parameter
On 3/28/15 1:55 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Subject: perf, record: Add clockid parameter
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:32:01 +0100
>
> Teach perf-record about the new perf_event_attr::{use_clockid, clockid}
> fields. Add a simple parameter to set the clock (if any) to be used for
> the events to be recorded into the data file.
>
> Since we store the entire perf_event_attr in the EVENT_DESC section we
> also already store the used clockid in the data file.
>
I am clearly missing some kernel patch to try out this perf patch. I
have the 4 timekeeper ones; none of those modify perf_event code. What
other patches are needed? Was this one (or some variant) accepted:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/20/236
Perhaps a better question is what tree has all of the kernel side patches?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists