[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55190F45.1070803@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:54:29 +0900
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC: Kyle McMartin <kmcmarti@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"geoff@...radead.org" <geoff@...radead.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"david.griego@...aro.org" <david.griego@...aro.org>,
"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
"freddy77@...il.com" <freddy77@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/5] arm64: kvm: reset hyp context for kexec
On 03/30/2015 04:16 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 02:39:53 +0100
> AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> On 03/28/2015 02:40 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 03:37:04PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>> [ 236.260863] Kernel panic - not syncing: HYP panic:
>>>>> [ 236.260863] PS:600003c9 PC:000003ffffff0830 ESR:0000000096000006
>>>>
>>>> It would be interesting if you could find out what you have at offset
>>>> 0x830 of hyp-init.o (the stack trace is for EL1, and is not going to
>>>> help much).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Given the alignment, i'm going to assume i'm looking at the right thing:
>>>
>>> 0000000000000820 <__kvm_hyp_reset>:
>>> 820: d51c2000 msr ttbr0_el2, x0
>>> 824: d5033fdf isb
>>> 828: d50c871f tlbi alle2
>>> 82c: d5033f9f dsb sy
>>> 830: 10000060 adr x0, 83c <__kvm_hyp_reset+0x1c>
>>> 834: b3403c01 bfxil x1, x0, #0, #16
>>> 838: d61f0020 br x1
>>> 83c: d53c1000 mrs x0, sctlr_el2
>>>
>>> but it seems fairly implausible to be trapping on ADR x0, 1f...
>>
>>
>> I've never seen this panic on fast model...
>>
>> ESR shows that
>> - Exception class: Data abort taken without a change in Exception level
>> - Data fault status code: Translation fault at EL2
>>
>> and FAR seems not to be a proper address.
>
> ... which is consistent with what we're seeing here (data fault on
> something that doesn't generate a load/store). I'm pretty sure the
> page tables are screwed.
>
> Have you tested it with 64k pages?
Hmm... It seems that I was able to reproduce the problem if 64k pages enabled.
-Takahiro AKASHI
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists