lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55191C2B.1050402@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:49:31 +0800
From:	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<laijs@...fujitsu.com>, <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] workqueue: fix a bug when numa mapping is changed

Hi Kame-san,

On 03/27/2015 12:42 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:

> On 2015/03/27 0:18, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:04:00PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
>>> wq generates the numa affinity (pool->node) for all the possible cpu's
>>> per cpu workqueue at init stage, that means the affinity of currently un-present
>>> ones' may be incorrect, so we need to update the pool->node for the new added cpu
>>> to the correct node when preparing online, otherwise it will try to create worker
>>> on invalid node if node hotplug occurred.
>>
>> If the mapping is gonna be static once the cpus show up, any chance we
>> can initialize that for all possible cpus during boot?
>>
> 
> I think the kernel can define all possible
> 
>  cpuid <-> lapicid <-> pxm <-> nodeid
> 
> mapping at boot with using firmware table information.

Could you explain more?

> 
> One concern is current x86 logic for memory-less node v.s. memory hotplug.
> (as I explained before)
> 
> My idea is
>   step1. build all possible mapping at boot cpuid <-> apicid <-> pxm <-> node id at boot.
> 
> But this may be overwritten by x86's memory less node logic. So,
>   step2. check node is online or not before calling kmalloc. If offline, use -1.
>          rather than updating workqueue's attribute.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Kame
> 
> .
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ