linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] dma: vdma: Fix compilation warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BL2FFO11FD0547729E39ACFCB0A988C88A1F50@BL2FFO11FD054.protection.gbl>
Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:40:02 +0000
From:	Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	"vinod.koul@...el.com" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Anirudha Sarangi" <anirudh@...inx.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dma: vdma: Fix compilation warnings

Hi Stephen Rothwell,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:sfr@...b.auug.org.au]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 3:06 PM
> To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
> Cc: vinod.koul@...el.com; linux-next@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Anirudha Sarangi; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: vdma: Fix compilation warnings
>
> Hi Kedareswara,
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:30:26 +0530 Kedareswara rao Appana
> <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dmapool.h b/include/linux/dmapool.h index
> > 022e34f..01c91bb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dmapool.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dmapool.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >
> >  #include <asm/io.h>
> >  #include <asm/scatterlist.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> >
> >  struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create(const char *name, struct device *dev,
> >                     size_t size, size_t align, size_t allocation);
>
> This might be to much, all it really needs is a
>
> struct device;
>
> line ...

Why it is a better solution rather than including header file?
I didn't get you could you please explain a bit.

Regards,
Kedar.

>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au


This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/