[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5519646C.9010802@mentor.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:57:48 -0500
From: Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
On 03/30/2015 03:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:15:37 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> I'll drop the VDSO stuff from the ARM tree; I can't see a way to keep
>> it in my tree and keep my tree buildable without dragging in the tip
>> tree.
>
> Does it affect your tree on its own? If not, then it can be fixed when
> merged as I have done, or if you look at the tip tree, all you really
> need to merge is tip timers/core branch (which I am sure the tip guys
> can tell you if it is stable enough) which is about 28 commits ...
>
>> The ARM VDSO stuff will just have to wait for 4.2 instead.
>
> If that works for you.
FWIW, Stephen's merge fix is correct and I have run my vdso tests
without problems on OMAP5 with next-20150330.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists