lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 01:02:29 +0900
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
	Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@...il.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] clk: samsung: Add a clock lookup function

Hi Javier,

2015-03-31 0:53 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>:
> The Samsung helpers functions to register clocks, add the clock instance
> returned by the common clock framework to a lookup table that is used by
> OF to lookup the clocks.
>
> But this table could also be useful to clock drivers if they need to get
> a clock instance since the helper functions don't return them.
>
> The common clock framework __clk_lookup() function from the clk provider
> API could be used by drivers as well. But it's more efficient to use the
> Samsung specific lookup table that returns the clock instance in constant
> time, than using the __clk_lookup() function that uses the clock name as
> an index so it has a linear search time.

Is this really something we should be concerned about? If so, maybe
the generic look-up function should be rewritten to use something
faster, such as tree or hash table?

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ