lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:31:09 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Cc:	keescook@...omium.org, ccross@...roid.com, anton@...msg.org,
	tony.luck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	peifeiyue@...wei.com, morgan.wang@...wei.com, sergiu@...omium.org,
	salyzyn@...roid.com, anton.vorontsov@...aro.org,
	marco.stornelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramoops: make it possible to change mem_type param.

* Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com> [150327 02:43]:
> If we set ramoops.mem_type=1 in command line, the current
> code can not change mem_type to 1, because it is assigned
> to 0 in function ramoops_register_dummy.
> 
> This patch make it possible to change mem_type parameter
> in command line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
>
> ---
>  fs/pstore/ram.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index 44a549b..65e0532 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ module_param(mem_size, ulong, 0400);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(mem_size,
>  		"size of reserved RAM used to store oops/panic logs");
>  
> -static unsigned int mem_type;
> +static unsigned int mem_type = 0;
>  module_param(mem_type, uint, 0600);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(mem_type,
>  		"set to 1 to try to use unbuffered memory (default 0)");

The BSS gets cleared during init so no need to initialize the mem_type
separately here and you can drop the change above AFAIK.

> @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static void ramoops_register_dummy(void)
>  
>  	dummy_data->mem_size = mem_size;
>  	dummy_data->mem_address = mem_address;
> -	dummy_data->mem_type = 0;
> +	dummy_data->mem_type = mem_type;
>  	dummy_data->record_size = record_size;
>  	dummy_data->console_size = ramoops_console_size;
>  	dummy_data->ftrace_size = ramoops_ftrace_size;

For this change sounds like a bug. Sorry I was not able to test
that with the hardware I have here. Good thing you have been able
to verify it with your hardware. If you drop the first part and
repost, please also feel free to add:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ