lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:45:33 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"acme@...radead.org" <acme@...radead.org>,
	"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/6] perf, x86: handle multiple records in PEBS buffer

> 
> The case you mentioned has already covered in the description. 

AFAIK the description was for the "two PEBS events are happening nearby,
so the hardware merges them" case. That is different than what I
described.

Both can happen (very rarely)

> I tried both multiple different events and multiple same events.
> As you said, the collision for multiple different events is rare.
> The collision for multiple same events is very high, but it's not a useful
> configuration
> 
> As my understanding, Peter means the multiple PEBS bits could be set
> when sampling only one single event.  

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ