linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 4/6] perf, x86: handle multiple records in PEBS buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:24:53 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"acme@...radead.org" <acme@...radead.org>,
	"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/6] perf, x86: handle multiple records in PEBS buffer

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:11:16PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> For now we can simply only allow multi pebs if only a single
> PEBS event is active (non PEBS events don't matter, as we
> can just ignore those)
> 
> This would be always on Atom, which only has a single PEBS
> counter.

I didn't say we can't do this for the big cores; I just said I want a
coherent story about what and why we're doing this.

The explanation was missing half the story, that's not good.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/