[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx48=K9PjkDnRiHezFe6ePMhc3iVXGMk44keXoKvXaoPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:09:47 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] x86/asm/entry/32: tidy up some instructions
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ END(sysenter_badsys)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX32
>> movl %ss, %eax
>> /* see if on espfix stack */
>> - cmpw $__ESPFIX_SS, %ax
>> + cmpl $__ESPFIX_SS, %eax
>> jne 27f
>> movl $__KERNEL_DS, %eax
>> movl %eax, %ds
>
> This is incorrect. 32-bit reads from a segment register are not
> zero-extended. The upper 16 bits are implementation-defined. Most
> processors will clear them but it's not guaranteed.
Indeed. Brian is right. That cmpw needs to stay as a 16-bit compare.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists