linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] workqueue: fix a bug when numa mapping is changed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <551A3A01.7030707@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:09:05 +0900
From:	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<laijs@...fujitsu.com>, <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] workqueue: fix a bug when numa mapping is changed

On 2015/03/30 18:49, Gu Zheng wrote:
> Hi Kame-san,
>
> On 03/27/2015 12:42 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>
>> On 2015/03/27 0:18, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:04:00PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
>>>> wq generates the numa affinity (pool->node) for all the possible cpu's
>>>> per cpu workqueue at init stage, that means the affinity of currently un-present
>>>> ones' may be incorrect, so we need to update the pool->node for the new added cpu
>>>> to the correct node when preparing online, otherwise it will try to create worker
>>>> on invalid node if node hotplug occurred.
>>>
>>> If the mapping is gonna be static once the cpus show up, any chance we
>>> can initialize that for all possible cpus during boot?
>>>
>>
>> I think the kernel can define all possible
>>
>>   cpuid <-> lapicid <-> pxm <-> nodeid
>>
>> mapping at boot with using firmware table information.
>
> Could you explain more?

you can scan firmware's table and store all provided information for possible cpus/pxms
somewhere even while future cpus/mems are not onlined rather than determine them
on demand.
But this may be considered as API change for most hot-add users.

So, for now, I vote for detemining ids at online but record it is a good way.

Thanks,
-Kame










--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/