[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551A3DE2.90806@mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:25:38 +0300
From: Andrey Danin <danindrey@...l.ru>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ac100@...ts.launchpad.net, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: tegra: implement slave mode
Hi,
Sorry for long delay.
And thanks for the quick review. It helped a lot!
On 29.01.2015 14:41, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Initialization code is based on NVEC driver.
>>
>> There is a HW bug in AP20 that was also mentioned in kernel sources
>> for Toshiba AC100.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Danin <danindrey@...l.ru>
>
> Cool, thanks for the converison. While I usually like to only get the
> patches which I need to handle, please CC me to all patches next time. I
> am interested what changes were needed for the user of the slave
> framework, too.
Done. I sent v2 yesterday evening.
>
>> +static bool tegra_i2c_slave_isr(int irq, struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long status;
>> + u8 value;
>> +
>> + if (!i2c_dev->slave || !i2c_dev->slave->slave_cb)
>> + return false;
>
> Can this happen?
Yes. I call slave ISR without any conditions from main ISR routine.
>
>> + /* i2c master sends data to us */
>> + if (is_write(status)) {
>> + i2c_slave_event(i2c_dev->slave, I2C_SLAVE_REQ_WRITE_START,
>> + NULL);
>
> Can this HW create an interrupt once the address detection + RW bit are
> received? Or only if a complete write has been received?
Tegra I2C generates one interrupt per byte (address or data) and one
interrupt for stop bit.
>
>> +static int tegra_reg_slave(struct i2c_client *slave)
>> +{
>> + struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(slave->adapter);
>> +
>> + if (i2c_dev->slave)
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> + i2c_dev->slave = slave;
>> +
>> + tegra_i2c_clock_enable(i2c_dev);
>> +
>> + reset_control_assert(i2c_dev->rst);
>> + udelay(2);
>> + reset_control_deassert(i2c_dev->rst);
>
> Why do you need a reset when a slave gets registered?
I copied this code from nvec driver. Reset is done during I2C controller
initialization. This reset is not needed. Thanks for pointing.
>
>> +
>> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, I2C_SL_CNFG_NEWSL, I2C_SL_CNFG);
>> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0x1E, I2C_SL_DELAY_COUNT);
>
> What does this magic number mean?
It's a default value. I created a constant for it.
>
>> +
>> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, slave->addr, I2C_SL_ADDR1);
>> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0, I2C_SL_ADDR2);
>
> Handling 10 bit addresses?
In v2.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
>> static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra30_i2c_hw = {
>> @@ -679,6 +808,7 @@ static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra30_i2c_hw = {
>> .has_single_clk_source = false,
>> .clk_divisor_hs_mode = 3,
>> .clk_divisor_std_fast_mode = 0,
>> + .slave_read_start_delay = 0,
>
> No need to init to 0 IMO.
>
Ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists