lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1427790767.17170.95.camel@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:32:47 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Cc:	Chris Mason <clm@...com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKP ML <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [Btrfs] 3a8b36f3780: -62.6% fileio.requests_per_sec

Hi, Filipe,

On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 10:05 +0000, Filipe Manana wrote:
[snip]

> Hi, thanks for this.
> 
> However this doesn't make sense to me.
> This commit only touches btrfs' fsync handler and the test uses sysbench
> without passing --file-fsync-freq to it, which means sysbench will never
> do fsyncs according to its man page (default for fsync frequency is 0).
> 
> Or maybe I missed something?

Sorry for late.

I checked source code of sysbench and found that the actual default
value of --file-fsync-freq is 100 instead of 0 in man page, as in the
following lines.

  {"file-fsync-freq", "do fsync() after this number of requests (0 - don't use fsync())",
   SB_ARG_TYPE_INT, "100"},

I double checked that via a debug patch to sysbench too.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ