linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 19/25] sched: Use bool function return values of true/false not 1/0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:03:49 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/25] sched: Use bool function return values of
 true/false not 1/0


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:46:17PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Use the normal return values for bool functions
> > 
> > Update the other sets of ret in try_wait_for_completion.
> 
> I'm missing a why; why are you doing this?

Let me guess: Joe Perches is suffering from 'trivialititis': a 
sickness that prevents a non-newbie kernel developer from raising 
beyond churning out a flood of trivial patches and creating 
unnecessary churn for other developers with these borderline useless 
patches?

Linux is a meritocracy, not a bureaucracy.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/