[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150331122631.44f50fa5@bee>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:26:31 +0200
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Daniel Hansel <daniel.hansel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 10/15] target-s390x: Prepare accelerator
during cpu object realization
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:33:51 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:23PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> > This patch implements routine s390_cpu_model_init(). It is called by the
> > realize function during instantiation of an cpu object. Its task is to
> > initialize the current accelerator with the properties of the selected
> > processor model.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > target-s390x/cpu-models.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > target-s390x/cpu-models.h | 4 ++++
> > target-s390x/cpu.c | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
> > index 8a877d3..ba873ea 100644
> > --- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
> > +++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
> > @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ typedef struct ParmAddrAddrModeMask {
> > } ParmAddrAddrModeMask;
> >
> > static GSList *s390_cpu_aliases;
> > +static bool cpu_models_used;
> >
> > /* compare order of two cpu classes for ascending sort */
> > gint s390_cpu_class_asc_order_compare(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
> > @@ -670,3 +671,39 @@ uint64_t *s390_current_fac_list_mask(void)
> > return s390_fac_list_mask_by_machine(mc->name);
> > }
> > #endif
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * s390_cpu_model_init:
> > + * @cc: S390 CPU class
> > + *
> > + * This function intitializes the current accelerator with processor
> > + * related properties.
> > + *
> > + * Since: 2.4
> > + */
> > +void s390_cpu_model_init(S390CPUClass *cc)
> > +{
> > + S390ProcessorProps proc;
> > +
> > + /* none cpu model case */
> > + if (!strcmp(object_class_get_name(OBJECT_CLASS(cc)), TYPE_S390_CPU)) {
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> Instead of checking the class name, can't you just check a S390CPUClass
> field that may indicate that s390_cpu_model_init() doesn't need to do
> anything for the class? Maybe (cpuid(cc->proc) == 0)?
That will work as well but excludes cpuid 0 from being a valid cpu id.
>
>
> > +
> > + /* accelerator already prepared */
> > + if (cpu_models_used) {
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> I'm still trying to understand the need for this global. But I will ask
> for more details in the following patches that actually use
> s390_cpu_models_used()?
I'm currently using the variable to avoid multiple calls to kvm_s390_set_processor_props() as it
sets the processor properties for all vcpus. I will not hurt to call it twice or more often, it
is just not required and just consumes cpu cycles.
>
> > +
> > + proc.cpuid = cpuid(cc->proc);
> > + proc.ibc = cc->proc.ibc;
> > + bitmap_zero(proc.fac_list, FAC_LIST_ARCH_S390_SIZE_UINT1);
> > + bitmap_copy(proc.fac_list, cc->fac_list[ACCEL_CURRENT],
> > + FAC_LIST_CPU_S390_SIZE_UINT1);
> > +
> > + if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > + if (!kvm_s390_set_processor_props(&proc)) {
> > + cpu_models_used = true;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
> > index 9562088..fe3997f 100644
> > --- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
> > +++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
> > @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@
> > #define type_cpuid(x) ((uint64_t)((x) & 0xffff) << 16)
> > #define id_cpuid(x) ((uint64_t)((x) & 0xffffff) << 32)
> > #define ver_cpuid(x) ((uint64_t)((x) & 0xff) << 56)
> > +#define cpuid(x) (ver_cpuid(x.ver) | \
> > + id_cpuid(x.id) | \
> > + type_cpuid(x.type))
> >
> > #define oldest_ibc(x) (((uint32_t)(x) >> 16) & 0xfff)
> > #define newest_ibc(x) ((uint32_t)(x) & 0xfff)
> > @@ -108,6 +111,7 @@ void s390_cpu_list_entry(gpointer data, gpointer user_data);
> > bool s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void);
> > uint64_t *s390_fac_list_mask_by_machine(const char *name);
> > uint64_t *s390_current_fac_list_mask(void);
> > +void s390_cpu_model_init(S390CPUClass *cc);
> >
> > extern uint64_t qemu_s390_fac_list_mask[];
> >
> > diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.c b/target-s390x/cpu.c
> > index c33f05e..829945d 100644
> > --- a/target-s390x/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target-s390x/cpu.c
> > @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
> > S390CPUClass *scc = S390_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev);
> >
> > + s390_cpu_model_init(scc);
> > s390_cpu_gdb_init(cs);
> > qemu_init_vcpu(cs);
> > #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists