[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150331131441.GD4441@8bytes.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:14:41 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
jroedel@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16 v2] iommu: Move domain allocation into drivers
Hi Alex,
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:24:22PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> For 1-5,16
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Thanks a lot for your review.
> My only comment/question is whether you'd want to consider using
> ERR_PTR() return values from domain_alloc(). It's an alloc functions,
> so NULL == -ENOMEM is pretty standard, but we could at least have the
> interface to the iommu driver return more info even if we continue to
> mask that as NULL out to the IOMMU API users for now. Thanks,
Yes, that might make sense. But to do anything useful with the ERR_PTR
we also need to change the iommu_domain_alloc() interface. This is
out-of-scope for this patch-set, we can discuss this seperatly.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists