linux-kernel - Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH] SQUASHME: Streamline pmem.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:44:56 +0300
From:	Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
To:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH] SQUASHME: Streamline pmem.c

On 03/27/2015 01:31 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com> wrote:
>>
>> Christoph why did you choose the fat and ugly version of
>> pmem.c beats me.
> 
> Boaz, I am so very tired of your snide commentary.  It severely
> detracts from the technical merit of your patches.  Please stop.
> 

Hi Dan

snide (snīd)
adj. snid·er, snid·est
 1. Mocking or derogatory in a malicious or ironic way

Please do not take me seriously. I'm just a joke ;-)
There is no "malicious nor Mocking" in any of my words Yes maybe some
"irony"

I think "severely detracts" is a bit of an exaggeration, no?

All I really really care about is like you, the "technical merit"

Thanks
Boaz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/