[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551AA78D.4040502@talpey.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:56:29 -0400
From: Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
To: Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC: "ira.weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>,
PJ Waskiewicz <pj.waskiewicz@...idfire.com>,
Tatyana Nikolova <Tatyana.E.Nikolova@...el.com>,
Yan Burman <yanb@...lanox.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Alex Estrin <alex.estrin@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Erez Shitrit <erezsh@...lanox.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Shachar Raindel <raindel@...lanox.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Tom Tucker <tom@....us>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/11] IB/Verbs: Use management helper has_iwarp()
for, iwarp-check
On 3/31/2015 7:41 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> Hi, Tom
>
> Thanks for the comments :-)
>
> On 03/31/2015 01:19 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
[oops - repeating my reply with full cc's]
>> [snip]
>>
>>>
>>> Actually I'm thinking about Doug's idea to use rdma_transport_is_XX()
>>> instead of the current basic helper, thus may be use rdma_transport_is_iwarp()
>>> in here could be better, since it's actually a feature of iwarp tech
>>> that RDMA Read only support one scatter-gather entry.
>>
>> No, you should expose an attribute to surface the maximum length of
>> the remote gather list, which varies by adapter as well as protocol.
>> The fact that iWARP is different from IB is not relevant, and conflates
>> unrelated properties.
>
> To be confirmed, so your point is that the max-read-sges will be different
> even the transport is the same IWRAP, and that depends on the capability
> of adapter, correct?
Yes, in fact the iWARP protocol does not preclude multiple read SGEs,
even though most iWARP implementations have chosen to support just one.
Even for multi-SGE-capable adapters, there is a limit of SGL size, based
on the adapter's work request format and other factors. So my argument
is that upper layers can and should query that, not make a blanket
decision based on protocol type.
>
> I currently only find this one place where infer max-read-sges from
> transport type, it looks more like a special case to me rather than a generic
> method we could exposed... and also not very related with IB management
> helper concept IMHO.
It is most certainly not a special case, but you could decide to
introduce it in many ways. I'm not commenting on that.
My main concern is that you do not introduce a new and clumsy "is iWARP"
rule as an adapter-specific API requirement to expose the RDMA Read SGE
behavior. That's what your initial message seemed to imply?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists