[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551AC0DE.40807@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:44:30 +0300
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: <vinod.koul@...el.com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Remove mapping between virtual
channels and requests
On 03/27/2015 10:22 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:26:52PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Do not direct map the virtual channels to sDMA request number. When the
>> sDMA is behind of a crossbar this direct mapping can cause situations when
>> certain channel can not be requested since the crossbar request number
>> will no longer match with the sDMA request line.
>> The direct mapping for virtual channels with HW request lines will make it
>> harder to implement MEM_TO_MEM mode for the driver.
>
> There's no point having 127 virtual DMA channels then... is there?
> We might as well reduce the number down to a more reasonable set
> rather than wasting memory.
I was also come to the same conclusion. My plan was to change the virtual DMA
channels to the same as the sDMA's logical channels.
>> @@ -1049,7 +1050,6 @@ static int omap_dma_chan_init(struct omap_dmadev *od, int dma_sig)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> c->reg_map = od->reg_map;
>> - c->dma_sig = dma_sig;
>
> That's the only user of dma_sig in this function. Why not remove it from
> the function prototype and its caller?
>
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists