linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:24:18 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	<linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests

On 3/31/15, 8:32 AM, "Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:

>Hi Daren,
>
>On 03/27/2015 04:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> Hi Shuah,
>> 
>> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into
>>kselftest.
>> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and
>>stress may
>> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand.
>> 
>> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored others
>>that would
>> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using volatile
>>and not
>> creating new typedefs.
>> 
>> The patches will follow, but I'm providing a pull request for your
>>convenience
>> as well.
>
>Thanks for acting on this so quickly after we talked about it at ELC.
>Just a quick note that I am going to get to this soon once I get the
>4.1 content wrapped up. We can plan upon getting these into 4.2.

OK. Michael E. provided some feedback which I can either incorporate and
respin, or I can send as a follow-on to your -next after you merge these.
Which do you prefer?

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/