linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 19/25] sched: Use bool function return values of true/false not 1/0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:46:40 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/25] sched: Use bool function return values of
 true/false not 1/0

On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 11:03 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:46:17PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Use the normal return values for bool functions
> > > 
> > > Update the other sets of ret in try_wait_for_completion.
> > 
> > I'm missing a why; why are you doing this?
> 
> Let me guess: Joe Perches is suffering from 'trivialititis': a 
> sickness that prevents a non-newbie kernel developer from raising 
> beyond churning out a flood of trivial patches and creating 
> unnecessary churn for other developers with these borderline useless 
> patches?

Good morning Ingo.

As you are a signer of that "code of conflict" patch,
I'll be mildly amused, but not surprised, if you are
among the first participants.

Perhaps you can search for your own name here.
http://lwn.net/Articles/637037/

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/