| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <551AF21E.2040506@datasoft.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:14:38 -0700
From: Aaron Brice <aaron.brice@...asoft.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, broonie@...nel.org
CC: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: fsl-dspi: Add ~50ns delay between cs and
sck
On 03/30/2015 03:13 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Thanks for the fixes! Some comments below:
>
Thanks for the review!
> On 2015-03-30 19:49, Aaron Brice wrote:
>> Add delay between chip select and clock signals, before clock starts and
>> after clock stops.
>
> This 50ns are specifc to the SPI slave at hand (SRAM) is this correct?
> If yes, this would probably need new slave properties. I found a TI
> controller which also supports such properties:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-September/285761.html
>
Thanks for the link. Those properties didn't make it into the kernel,
Mark said the chip select delays were covered by "the standard delays"
but I'm not sure what that means?
The minimum 50ns was specified in the SRAM datasheet, but I haven't
worked with a lot of SPI devices, I don't know if this varies widely or
if it's more or less standard?
I hard-coded this based on spi-bitbang having a hard-coded ndelay(100)
after chipselect, although there is a FIXME comment above it.. Should I
add this as a standard spi-bus slave node binding and update spi-bitbang
also, or just fsl-dspi?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Brice <aaron.brice@...asoft.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
>> index 96cac87..41284cc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/math64.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> @@ -51,7 +52,7 @@
>> #define SPI_CTAR_CPOL(x) ((x) << 26)
>> #define SPI_CTAR_CPHA(x) ((x) << 25)
>> #define SPI_CTAR_LSBFE(x) ((x) << 24)
>> -#define SPI_CTAR_PCSSCR(x) (((x) & 0x00000003) << 22)
>> +#define SPI_CTAR_PCSSCK(x) (((x) & 0x00000003) << 22)
>> #define SPI_CTAR_PASC(x) (((x) & 0x00000003) << 20)
>> #define SPI_CTAR_PDT(x) (((x) & 0x00000003) << 18)
>> #define SPI_CTAR_PBR(x) (((x) & 0x00000003) << 16)
>> @@ -59,6 +60,7 @@
>> #define SPI_CTAR_ASC(x) (((x) & 0x0000000f) << 8)
>> #define SPI_CTAR_DT(x) (((x) & 0x0000000f) << 4)
>> #define SPI_CTAR_BR(x) ((x) & 0x0000000f)
>> +#define SPI_CTAR_SCALE_BITS 0xf
>>
>> #define SPI_CTAR0_SLAVE 0x0c
>>
>> @@ -99,6 +101,8 @@
>> #define SPI_CS_ASSERT 0x02
>> #define SPI_CS_DROP 0x04
>>
>> +#define NSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000L
>> +
>
> Avoid redefine this, should be available from headers (e.g. time.h)
>
Ok.
>> struct chip_data {
>> u32 mcr_val;
>> u32 ctar_val;
>> @@ -174,6 +178,40 @@ static void hz_to_spi_baud(char *pbr, char *br,
>> int speed_hz,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void ns_delay_scale(char *psc, char *sc, int delay_ns,
>> + unsigned long clkrate)
>> +{
>> + int pscale_tbl[4] = {1, 3, 5, 7};
>> + int scale_needed, scale, minscale = INT_MAX;
>> + int i, j;
>> + u32 remainder;
>> +
>> + scale_needed = div_u64_rem((u64)delay_ns * clkrate, NSEC_PER_SEC,
>> + &remainder);
>> + if (remainder)
>> + scale_needed++;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pscale_tbl); i++)
>> + for (j = 0; j <= SPI_CTAR_SCALE_BITS; j++) {
>> + scale = pscale_tbl[i] * (2 << j);
>> + if (scale >= scale_needed) {
>> + if (scale < minscale) {
>> + minscale = scale;
>> + *psc = i;
>> + *sc = j;
>> + }
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (minscale == INT_MAX) {
>> + pr_warn("Cannot find correct scale values for %dns delay at clkrate
>> %ld, using max prescaler value",
>> + delay_ns, clkrate);
>> + *psc = ARRAY_SIZE(pscale_tbl) - 1;
>> + *sc = SPI_CTAR_SCALE_BITS;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static int dspi_transfer_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)
>> {
>> int tx_count = 0;
>> @@ -352,7 +390,8 @@ static int dspi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
>> {
>> struct chip_data *chip;
>> struct fsl_dspi *dspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>> - unsigned char br = 0, pbr = 0, fmsz = 0;
>> + unsigned char br = 0, pbr = 0, pcssck = 0, cssck = 0;
>> + unsigned char pasc = 0, asc = 0, fmsz = 0;
>>
>> if ((spi->bits_per_word >= 4) && (spi->bits_per_word <= 16)) {
>> fmsz = spi->bits_per_word - 1;
>> @@ -377,10 +416,20 @@ static int dspi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
>> hz_to_spi_baud(&pbr, &br,
>> spi->max_speed_hz, clk_get_rate(dspi->clk));
>>
>> + /* Set PCS to SCK delay scale values for 50ns delay*/
>> + ns_delay_scale(&pcssck, &cssck, 50, clk_get_rate(dspi->clk));
>> +
>> + /* Set After SCK delay scale values for 50ns delay*/
>> + ns_delay_scale(&pasc, &asc, 50, clk_get_rate(dspi->clk));
>> +
>
> This functions calls clk_get_rate three times, can you add a local
> variable for it?
>
Ok.
>> chip->ctar_val = SPI_CTAR_FMSZ(fmsz)
>> | SPI_CTAR_CPOL(spi->mode & SPI_CPOL ? 1 : 0)
>> | SPI_CTAR_CPHA(spi->mode & SPI_CPHA ? 1 : 0)
>> | SPI_CTAR_LSBFE(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST ? 1 : 0)
>> + | SPI_CTAR_PCSSCK(pcssck)
>> + | SPI_CTAR_CSSCK(cssck)
>> + | SPI_CTAR_PASC(pasc)
>> + | SPI_CTAR_ASC(asc)
>> | SPI_CTAR_PBR(pbr)
>> | SPI_CTAR_BR(br);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists