[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150401034701.GV7192@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:17:02 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Petr Kulhavy <petr@...ix.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peter.ujfalusi@...com,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] EDMA: TI: fixed wrongly initialized data parameter
to the edma callback
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 09:35:01PM +0100, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
> The "data" parameter passed indirectly to the edma_callback() should be
> edma_chan and not the dma_chan.
>
> This bug was so far harmless since the offset of struct dma_chan within struct
> edma_chan is 0. However as soon as someone changes struct edma_chan this would
> cause troubles.
Applied now, but do ensure you are using right subsystem anmes for patches.
I have fixed up now
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists