[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1427864852.18175.53.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:07:32 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Custom printk format specifier for device node
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 21:52 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> Thinking about this more, I'd like to suggest a different format that
> gives us a nice hack on the name that makes it easy to remember:
> '%pOF[...]'
> 'O' still means 'object', but it is also overloaded for Open Firmware.
> That still leaves %pO? for other object types. What do you think?
I think that's fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists