[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150401065802.GS27490@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:58:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/25] sched: Use bool function return values of
true/false not 1/0
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:46:40AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 11:03 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:46:17PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > Use the normal return values for bool functions
> > > >
> > > > Update the other sets of ret in try_wait_for_completion.
> > >
> > > I'm missing a why; why are you doing this?
> >
> > Let me guess: Joe Perches is suffering from 'trivialititis': a
> > sickness that prevents a non-newbie kernel developer from raising
> > beyond churning out a flood of trivial patches and creating
> > unnecessary churn for other developers with these borderline useless
> > patches?
>
> Good morning Ingo.
>
> As you are a signer of that "code of conflict" patch,
> I'll be mildly amused, but not surprised, if you are
> among the first participants.
OMFG, exactly the kind of f'king nonsense I was afraid of. PC brigade
gone rampant. Get a live people. An Joe please go do something useful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists