lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:35:57 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP ML <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mm] b191f9b106e: -8.8% netperf.time.minor_page_faults

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:23:34AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> commit b191f9b106ea1a24a711dbebb2925d3313da5852 ("mm: numa: preserve PTE write permissions across a NUMA hinting fault")
> 
> 
> testbox/testcase/testparams: lkp-ne02/netperf/performance-300s-200%-TCP_SENDFILE
> 
> bea66fbd11af1ca9  b191f9b106ea1a24a711dbebb2  
> ----------------  --------------------------  
>          %stddev     %change         %stddev
>              \          |                \  
>      13115 ±  0%      -8.8%      11968 ±  0%  netperf.time.minor_page_faults
>      65.63 ±  6%     -14.6%      56.05 ±  7%  netperf.time.user_time
>      65.63 ±  6%     -14.6%      56.05 ±  7%  time.user_time

Hmmm, is this a positive report? It looks like it -- fewer faults at
least. Lower user_time is ambiguous because the elapsed time is not
included in the report and netperf has variable time depending on
whether it can get a confident result or not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ