linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] phy: miphy365x: Use the generic phy type constants in dt-bindings/phy/phy.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <551BA5CB.6030903@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:31:15 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
CC:	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
	<patrice.chotard@...com>, <balbi@...com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] phy: miphy365x: Use the generic phy type constants
 in dt-bindings/phy/phy.h

Hi,

On Wednesday 01 April 2015 12:45 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>> Hi Kishon,
>> On 03/31/2015 05:30 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Maxime,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 31 March 2015 01:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Patrice, Maxime,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday 30 March 2015 08:47 PM, Peter Griffin wrote:
>>>>>> Now there are generic phy type constants declared in phy.h,
>>>>>> migrate over to
>>>>>> using them rather than defining our own. This change has
>>>>>> been done as one
>>>>>> atomic commit to be bisectable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note: The values of the defines are the same, so there is no
>>>>>> ABI breakage
>>>>>> with this patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you okay for this patch to go via PHY tree? It modifies
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts
>>>>> /stih416.dtsi.
>>>>
>>>> These files need to be changed simultaneously in order to prevent
>>>> breakage during bisection and the like.  I think the best bet moving
>>>> forward is to pull this into its own branch, tag it and send Maxime a
>>>> pull-request to the immutable branch.  It's the best way to minimise
>>>> merge conflicts during the v4.1 merge window.
>>>
>>> okay. I still need an Ack from Maxime.
>>
>> You have my Ack.
>>
>> I haven't sent a pull request for STi DT files for v4.1 now, and it
>> is too late to send one.
>> So creating an immutable tag is not even needed in my opinion, you
>> can just take the DT patch.
>
> Kishon,
>
> I saw that you took the MAINTAINERS patch, but not this one.  If it's
> because you are still unsure about it, I agree with Maxime, you can
> just take this patch without fear of conflict.

I've took this already
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git/commit/?h=next&id=76fa6deabab05688a1653c2f66224be4a3c08d6a

-Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/