lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:31:15 +0530 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com> CC: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>, <patrice.chotard@...com>, <balbi@...com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <robherring2@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] phy: miphy365x: Use the generic phy type constants in dt-bindings/phy/phy.h Hi, On Wednesday 01 April 2015 12:45 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > >> Hi Kishon, >> On 03/31/2015 05:30 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> Maxime, >>> >>> On Tuesday 31 March 2015 01:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Patrice, Maxime, >>>>> >>>>> On Monday 30 March 2015 08:47 PM, Peter Griffin wrote: >>>>>> Now there are generic phy type constants declared in phy.h, >>>>>> migrate over to >>>>>> using them rather than defining our own. This change has >>>>>> been done as one >>>>>> atomic commit to be bisectable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note: The values of the defines are the same, so there is no >>>>>> ABI breakage >>>>>> with this patch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org> >>>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> >>>>>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> >>>>> >>>>> Are you okay for this patch to go via PHY tree? It modifies >>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts >>>>> /stih416.dtsi. >>>> >>>> These files need to be changed simultaneously in order to prevent >>>> breakage during bisection and the like. I think the best bet moving >>>> forward is to pull this into its own branch, tag it and send Maxime a >>>> pull-request to the immutable branch. It's the best way to minimise >>>> merge conflicts during the v4.1 merge window. >>> >>> okay. I still need an Ack from Maxime. >> >> You have my Ack. >> >> I haven't sent a pull request for STi DT files for v4.1 now, and it >> is too late to send one. >> So creating an immutable tag is not even needed in my opinion, you >> can just take the DT patch. > > Kishon, > > I saw that you took the MAINTAINERS patch, but not this one. If it's > because you are still unsure about it, I agree with Maxime, you can > just take this patch without fear of conflict. I've took this already https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git/commit/?h=next&id=76fa6deabab05688a1653c2f66224be4a3c08d6a -Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists