linux-kernel - [PATCH] Documentation/memcg: update memcg/kmem status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1427898636-4505-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:30:36 +0300
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/memcg: update memcg/kmem status

Memcg/kmem reclaim support has been finally merged. Reflect this in the
documentation.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
---
 Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt |    8 +++-----
 init/Kconfig                     |    6 ------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
index a22df3ad35ff..f456b4315e86 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
@@ -275,11 +275,6 @@ When oom event notifier is registered, event will be delivered.
 
 2.7 Kernel Memory Extension (CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM)
 
-WARNING: Current implementation lacks reclaim support. That means allocation
-	 attempts will fail when close to the limit even if there are plenty of
-	 kmem available for reclaim. That makes this option unusable in real
-	 life so DO NOT SELECT IT unless for development purposes.
-
 With the Kernel memory extension, the Memory Controller is able to limit
 the amount of kernel memory used by the system. Kernel memory is fundamentally
 different than user memory, since it can't be swapped out, which makes it
@@ -345,6 +340,9 @@ set:
     In this case, the admin could set up K so that the sum of all groups is
     never greater than the total memory, and freely set U at the cost of his
     QoS.
+    WARNING: In the current implementation, memory reclaim will NOT be
+    triggered for a cgroup when it hits K while staying below U, which makes
+    this setup impractical.
 
     U != 0, K >= U:
     Since kmem charges will also be fed to the user counter and reclaim will be
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 7766b500f679..caffca37ccb7 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -1059,12 +1059,6 @@ config MEMCG_KMEM
 	  the kmem extension can use it to guarantee that no group of processes
 	  will ever exhaust kernel resources alone.
 
-	  WARNING: Current implementation lacks reclaim support. That means
-	  allocation attempts will fail when close to the limit even if there
-	  are plenty of kmem available for reclaim. That makes this option
-	  unusable in real life so DO NOT SELECT IT unless for development
-	  purposes.
-
 config CGROUP_HUGETLB
 	bool "HugeTLB Resource Controller for Control Groups"
 	depends on HUGETLB_PAGE
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/