linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <551B56E0.7090209@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:24:32 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Lad@...ck-us.net,
	Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

On 03/31/2015 04:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:07:49 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> alpha:allmodconfig
>>> mips:allmodconfig
>>>
>>> samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c: In function ‘prime_new’:
>>> samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c:930:18: error: ‘__NR_memfd_create’ undeclared
>>> (first use in this function)
>>>    p->fd = syscall(__NR_memfd_create, "prime-area", MFD_CLOEXEC);
>>>
>>> Looks like the kdbus example never worked for the affected architectures.
>>> I don't build allmodconfig for all architectures, so other architectures
>>> may be affected as well.
>>
>> You need 3.17 kernel headers to have memfd_create, not much the kdbus
>> test code can do about that.  You might want to update the kernel
>> headers for these build boxes.
>>
>> Or have we not hooked up memfd for alpha and mips?
>
> alpha has no definition for __NR_memfd_create and doesn't use
> asm-generic/unistd.h.
>
> mips has a definition for __NR_memfd_create if _MIPS_SIM ==
> _MIPS_SIM_ABI32, _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 or _MIPS_SIM_NABI32 (is there any
> other alternative?).
>

Guess you are saying that those examples won't build even with a
newer toolchain. Good that I already decided not to re-build my
toolchains ;-).

Now I am left with the question if the samples build should be
masked for alpha and mips, or if I should drop building samples
from my 'allmodconfig' builds. I think I'll do the latter;
there seems to be an expectation that samples are built with
a recent toolchain, and I can not keep rebuilding toolchains for
the rest of my life.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/