[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9472f1ca4c19a38ecda45bba9c91b7168135fcfa.1427923514.git.luto@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:26:34 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH urgent v2] x86, asm: Disable opportunistic SYSRET if regs->flags has TF set
When I wrote the opportunistic SYSRET code, I missed an important
difference between SYSRET and IRET. Both instructions are capable
of setting EFLAGS.TF, but they behave differently when doing so.
IRET will not issue a #DB trap after execution when it sets TF This
is critical -- otherwise you'd never be able to make forward
progress when returning to userspace. SYSRET, on the other hand,
will trap with #DB immediately after returning to CPL3, and the next
instruction will never execute.
This breaks anything that opportunistically SYSRETs to a user
context with TF set. For example, running this code with TF set and
a SIGTRAP handler loaded never gets past post_nop.
extern unsigned char post_nop[];
asm volatile ("pushfq\n\t"
"popq %%r11\n\t"
"nop\n\t"
"post_nop:"
: : "c" (post_nop) : "r11");
In my defense, I can't find this documented in the AMD or Intel
manual.
Fix it by using IRET to restore TF.
Fixes: 2a23c6b8a9c4 x86_64, entry: Use sysret to return to userspace when possible
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
This affects 4.0-rc as well as -tip. A full test case lives here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/misc-tests.git/
It's called single_step_syscall_64.
On Intel systems, the 32-bit version of that test fails for unrelated
reasons, but that's not a regression, and fixing it will be much more
intrusive.
Changes from v1:
- Remove mention of testl from changelog.
- Improve comment per Denys' suggestion.
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
index 750c6efcb718..537716380959 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -715,7 +715,21 @@ retint_swapgs: /* return to user-space */
cmpq %r11,EFLAGS(%rsp) /* R11 == RFLAGS */
jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
- testq $X86_EFLAGS_RF,%r11 /* sysret can't restore RF */
+ /*
+ * SYSRET can't restore RF. SYSRET can restore TF, but unlike IRET,
+ * restoring TF results in a trap from userspace immediately after
+ * SYSRET. This would cause an infinite loop whenever #DB happens
+ * with register state that satisfies the opportunistic SYSRET
+ * conditions. For example, single-stepping this user code:
+ *
+ * movq $stuck_here,%rcx
+ * pushfq
+ * popq %r11
+ * stuck_here:
+ *
+ * would never get past stuck_here.
+ */
+ testq $(X86_EFLAGS_RF|X86_EFLAGS_TF),%r11
jnz opportunistic_sysret_failed
/* nothing to check for RSP */
--
2.3.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists