lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZBYRJ9OCQOAb8Y7_pXqrumomRhr=u8KJHN12jBdhu=A4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:34:18 +0300
From:	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
To:	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] configfs: init configfs module earlier at boot time

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com> wrote:
> We need this earlier in the boot process to allow various subsystems
> to use configfs (e.g Industrial IIO).
>
> Also, debugfs is at core_initcall level and configfs should be on
> the same level from infrastructure point of view.
>
> Suggested-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
> ---
> First time I miscopied Joel's email address.
>
>  fs/configfs/mount.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/configfs/mount.c b/fs/configfs/mount.c
> index da94e41..5373567 100644
> --- a/fs/configfs/mount.c
> +++ b/fs/configfs/mount.c
> @@ -173,5 +173,5 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  MODULE_VERSION("0.0.2");
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Simple RAM filesystem for user driven kernel subsystem configuration.");
>
> -module_init(configfs_init);
> +core_initcall(configfs_init);
>  module_exit(configfs_exit);
> --


Hi Joel,

Did you get any chance to look into this? I am not sure
exactly who should take this, so I'm adding Greg.

The original patch can also be found here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/18/751

Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ