[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5A8im4c126wZyD8tv1B0-2mvsgh5bfZ1mJWyMhG0fNM_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:02:24 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Add simple read disturb test
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> + ret = mtdtest_erase_eraseblock(mtd, i);
> + if (ret) {
> + err = ret;
> + goto out;
> + }
Why not just do like this instead?
err = mtdtest_erase_eraseblock(mtd, i);
if (err)
goto out;
> +
> + ret = mtdtest_write(mtd, i * mtd->erasesize, mtd->erasesize,
> + iobuf_orig);
> + if (ret) {
> + err = ret;
> + goto out;
> + }
Same here.
> + ret = mtdtest_relax();
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
Here you propagate the wrong error. You test for 'ret' and propagate 'err'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists