[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551D6BDA.6000606@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:18:34 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
CC: dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Add simple read disturb test
Am 02.04.2015 um 18:04 schrieb Brian Norris:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:13:46PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> This simple MTD tests allows the user to see when read disturb happens.
>> By reading blocks over and over it reports flipped bits.
>> Currently it reports only flipped bits of the worst page of a block.
>> If within block X page P1 has 3 bit flips and P6 4, it will report 4.
>> By default every 50th block is read.
>
> Didn't read through this much yet, but why do we need another in-kernel
> test that coul (AFAICT) be easily replicated in userspace? The same goes
> for several of the other tests, I think, actually. But at least with
> those, we have a history of keeping them around, so it's not too much
> burden [1].
I've added the test to drivers/mtd/tests/ because it fits into.
As simple as that.
> Brian
>
> [1] Although there are some latent issues in these tests that are still
> getting get worked out (e.g., bad handling of 64-bit casting; too large
> of stacks; uninterruptibility). The latter two would not even exist if
> we were in user space.
uninterruptibility got solved by my "[PATCH] mtd: Make MTD tests cancelable" patch.
But if we want to kill drivers/mtd/tests/ I'll happily help out.
Where shall we move these tests into? mtd-utils?
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists