[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150402164431.GB9774@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 18:44:31 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH] pmem: Add prints at module load and
unload
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:01:14AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> If anything I think these should be dev_dbg().
> >
> > We do not have a dev at any of this point, and it does not
> > belong to any specific device.
>
> Ah, true this is prior to the driver attaching... that said it seems
> more relevant to print from probe() (where we do have a device) than
> init where the device may remain idle due to some other policy.
>
> > Also I would like this
> > _info and not _dbg so to always have it, also for production.
> > See the chatter for a single SCSI disk the minimum we need
> > is just the small print that tells all that we need (for now)
>
> Not sure we want to follow so closely in the footsteps of SCSI's chattiness.
Defintively not! A single dev_info at ->probe time sounds ok, something
like:
dev_info(dev, "registering region [0x%pa:0x%zx]\n",
&pmem->phys_addr, pmem->size);
but there are plenty other drivers not that chatty, e.g. virtio and we're
doing just fine for them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists