[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150402032405.GB9218@dhcp-128-53.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:24:05 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
bhe@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/numa: kernel stack corruption fix
Hi, Xishi
[snip]
> >> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> >> +++ linux/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> >> @@ -484,7 +484,8 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_nod
> >>
> >> /* Mark all kernel nodes. */
> >> for_each_memblock(reserved, r)
> >> - node_set(r->nid, numa_kernel_nodes);
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> How about add some comment here? if set numa=off, numa_meminfo may not include
> all the memblock.reserved memory. e.g. trim_snb_memory()
Sure, I can do that. I will send an update if there's no other comments.
> >> + if (r->nid != MAX_NUMNODES)
> >> + node_set(r->nid, numa_kernel_nodes);
> >>
> >> /* Clear MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG flag for memory in kernel nodes. */
> >> for (i = 0; i < numa_meminfo.nr_blks; i++) {
> >>
> >
>
Thanks
Dave
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists