linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v13 04/13] DT: Add documentation for the mfd Maxim max77693

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150402193355.GG9447@x1>
Date:	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:33:55 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, cooloney@...il.com, rpurdie@...ys.net,
	sakari.ailus@....fi, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v13 04/13] DT: Add documentation for the mfd Maxim
 max77693

On Thu, 02 Apr 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:

> On Mon 2015-03-23 15:59:37, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon 2015-03-23 15:02:13, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > On Mon 2015-03-23 12:07:43, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > This patch requires a DT Ack.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No, it requires DT people to be notified -- and they were, few times
> > > > > by now.
> > > > > 
> > > > > They clearly don't care.
> > > > 
> > > > Well fortunately for the Kernel community, I do care.  And as this
> > > > patch adds 3 new DT properties, has been through many iterations
> > > > already with vast changes made over that period and there is still
> > > > some controversy looming, I'm saying that it _does_ require a DT
> > > > Ack.
> > > 
> > > Can you help get that ack, then? As a maintainer, you have better
> > > chance getting reply from DT people than patch submitter.
> > 
> > Hopefully they will see my plea a couple of replies back.
> > 
> > If that fails I'll go poke them via other means.  Failing that I'll go
> > see them in person and continually hit them with wet fish until one of
> > them relents.
> 
> Can I request footage of the last steps on the youtube?

Too late, it's been and gone.

> (IOW ping, I don't think I seen any replies from DT maintainers...)

Then you haven't been looking the right place [1]. ;)

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.leds/2245

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/