[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMAWPa_P5JFQsrL96KPnt0gu=P4O40cGbWkM1j6b6HGy4edErQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:12:28 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"grygorii.strashko@...aro.org" <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE
in gcc 4.7.3
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01 2015 at 15:57 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:47:49 +0100 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > -static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t
>>>> > put_new_page,
>>>> > - unsigned long private, struct page *page, int
>>>> > force,
>>>> > - enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>> > +static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
>>>> > + free_page_t put_new_page,
>>>> > + unsigned long private, struct page
>>>> > *page,
>>>> > + int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>> > {
>>>> > int rc = 0;
>>>> > int *result = NULL;
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Ouch. That's really ugly. And on 32bit ARM, we end-up spilling half of
>>>> the parameters on the stack, which is not going to help performance
>>>> either (not that this would be useful on 32bit ARM anyway...).
>>>>
>>>> Any chance you could make this dependent on some compiler detection
>>>> mechanism?
>>>
>>>
>>> With my arm compiler (gcc-4.4.4) the patch makes no difference -
>>> unmap_and_move() isn't being inlined anyway.
>>>
>>> How does this look?
>>>
>>> Kevin, could you please retest? I might have fat-fingered something...
>>
>>
>> Your patch on top of Geert's still compiles fine for me with gcc-4.7.3.
>> However, I'm not sure how specific we can be on the versions.
>>
>> /me goes to test a few more compilers... OK...
>>
>> ICE: 4.7.1, 4.7.3, 4.8.3
>> OK: 4.6.3, 4.9.2, 4.9.3
>>
>> The diff below[2] on top of yours compiles fine here and at least covers
>> the compilers I *know* to trigger the ICE.
>
>
> I see ICE on arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.4-2ubuntu1) 4.7.4
>
Thanks for checking. I'm assuming my patch fixes it for your since
that should catch any 4.7.x compiler.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists