[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150403121941.GB28325@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:19:42 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
Cc: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@....com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Kaplan <david.kaplan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: svm: remove SVM_EXIT_READ_CR* intercepts
2015-03-12 17:17-0400, Bandan Das:
> Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@....com> writes:
> > @@ -2968,29 +2964,10 @@ static int cr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> > kvm_queue_exception(&svm->vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
> > return 1;
> > }
> > - } else { /* mov from cr */
> > - [reads of CR 0..8]
> > + } else { /* mov from cr, should never trap in svm */
> > + WARN(1, "unhandled read from CR%d", cr);
> > + kvm_queue_exception(&svm->vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
> > + return 1;
>
> Can we end up here if a nested hypervisor sets cr read interception ?
No. If the nested hypervisor sets intercept bits, we're going to detect
them in 'handle_exit -> nested_svm_exit_handled -> nested_svm_intercept'
and enter L1 before the cr_interception handler.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists