[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150403142256.GA13595@earth>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:22:56 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
pali.rohar@...il.com, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com, patrikbachan@...il.com,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>, sakari.ailus@....fi,
m.chehab@...sung.com,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] media: i2c/adp1653: devicetree support for adp1653
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:49:12AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> The convention nowadays is to not use unnamed DT properties for GPIOs
> >> but instead use a prefix that explains what those GPIOs are used for.
> >> So something like "power-gpios" or "power-gpio" (if there is only one
> >> GPIO) will be more suitable. Please take a look to
> >> Documentation/gpio/board.txt for more details.
> >
> > Ok. Actually, reading docs below, "power-gpio" will not work, and it
> > needs to be "power-gpios", right?
> >
>
> No, the documentation is not updated. People used <function>-gpio so
> at the end it was added as another supported suffix, see commit:
> dd34c37aa3e8 ("gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names").
>
> But I guess it doesn't matter if -gpio or -gpios is used.
I suggest to use enable-gpio(s), since the pin is called "enable" in
the datasheet.
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists