[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1428077687.31093.120.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 10:14:47 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the
non-standard protected e820 type
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 09:12 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
:
> @@ -748,7 +758,7 @@ u64 __init early_reserve_e820(u64 size, u64 align)
> /*
> * Find the highest page frame number we have available
> */
> -static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type)
> +static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
> {
> int i;
> unsigned long last_pfn = 0;
> @@ -759,7 +769,11 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type)
> unsigned long start_pfn;
> unsigned long end_pfn;
>
> - if (ei->type != type)
> + /*
> + * Persistent memory is accounted as ram for purposes of
> + * establishing max_pfn and mem_map.
> + */
> + if (ei->type != E820_RAM && ei->type != E820_PRAM)
> continue;
Should we also delete this code, accounting E820_PRAM as ram, along with
the deletion of reserve_pmem() in this version?
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists