[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1428079429-4252-4-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:43:46 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
b.zolnierkie@...sung.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] clk: samsung: exynos4: add cpu clock configuration data
and instantiate cpu clock
From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>
With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the
arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type. Add the CPU clock
configuration data and instantiate the CPU clock type for Exynos4210.
Changes by Bartlomiej:
- fixed issue with wrong dividers being setup by Common Clock Framework
(by an addition of CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES clock flag to mout_apll clock,
without this change cpufreq-dt driver showed ~10 mA larger energy
consumption when compared to cpufreq-exynos one when "performance"
cpufreq governor was used on Exynos4210 SoC based Origen board), this
was probably meant to be workarounded by use of CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE
and CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY clock flags in the original patchset (in
"[PATCH v12 6/6] clk: samsung: remove unused clock aliases and update
clock flags") but using these flags is not sufficient to fix the issue
observed
- removed Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 support for now
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
---
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
index 714d6ba..cae2c048 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
#include "clk.h"
+#include "clk-cpu.h"
/* Exynos4 clock controller register offsets */
#define SRC_LEFTBUS 0x4200
@@ -534,7 +535,8 @@ static struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks[] __initda
/* list of mux clocks supported in all exynos4 soc's */
static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
MUX_FA(CLK_MOUT_APLL, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
- CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0, "mout_apll"),
+ CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES, 0,
+ "mout_apll"),
MUX(CLK_MOUT_HDMI, "mout_hdmi", mout_hdmi_p, SRC_TV, 0, 1),
MUX(0, "mout_mfc1", sclk_evpll_p, SRC_MFC, 4, 1),
MUX(0, "mout_mfc", mout_mfc_p, SRC_MFC, 8, 1),
@@ -1378,6 +1380,22 @@ static void __init exynos4x12_core_down_clock(void)
__raw_writel(0x0, reg_base + E4X12_PWR_CTRL2);
}
+#define E4210_CPU_DIV0(apll, pclk_dbg, atb, periph, corem1, corem0) \
+ (((apll) << 24) | ((pclk_dbg) << 20) | ((atb) << 16) | \
+ ((periph) << 12) | ((corem1) << 8) | ((corem0) << 4))
+#define E4210_CPU_DIV1(hpm, copy) \
+ (((hpm) << 4) | ((copy) << 0))
+
+static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4210_armclk_d[] __initconst = {
+ { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 4, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 5), },
+ { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 4, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 4), },
+ { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 3, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 3), },
+ { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 3, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 3), },
+ { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 3, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 3), },
+ { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(0, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 3), },
+ { 0 },
+};
+
/* register exynos4 clocks */
static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
enum exynos4_soc soc)
@@ -1455,6 +1473,10 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(ctx,
exynos4210_fixed_factor_clks,
ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_fixed_factor_clks));
+ exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk",
+ mout_core_p4210[0], mout_core_p4210[1], 0x14200,
+ e4210_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4210_armclk_d),
+ CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1);
} else {
samsung_clk_register_mux(ctx, exynos4x12_mux_clks,
ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_mux_clks));
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists