[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADFvMY+Y5NHwtEfXu0kh6y8DZ2Z9QeiN_Ak3r-YdNLg-h_Bu5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 21:21:54 -0400
From: Zhihui Zhang <zzhsuny@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use arbitrary large movablecore to calculate kernelcore
If you specify movablecore > totalpages, required_kernelcore will end
up with a big number because corepages is an unsigned integer. If so,
the following nested is a waste of time. But I see your point.
-Zhihui
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:36:02PM -0400, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>> If kernelcore is not set, then we are working with a very large kernelcore
>> for nothing - no movable zone will be created. If kernelcore is set,
>> then it is not respected at all.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhihui Zhang <zzhsuny@...il.com>
>
> I'm confused. What bug is this patch fixing? What is the user-visible
> impcat of the patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists