linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] mvneta: SGMII-based in-band link state signaling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:08:37 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	stsp@...t.ru
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] mvneta: SGMII-based in-band link state signaling

From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 20:28:25 +0300

> Currently the fixed-link DT binding is pre-configured and
> cannot be changed in run-time. This means the cable unplug
> events are not being detected, and the link parameters can't
> be negotiated.
> 
> The following patches are needed when mvneta is used
> in fixed-link mode (without MDIO).
> They add an API to fixed_phy that allows to update
> status, and use that API in the mvneta driver when parsing
> the SGMII in-band status.
> 
> There is also another implementation that doesn't add any API
> and does everything in mvneta driver locally:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/31/327
> I'll let people decide which approach is better.
> No strong opinion on my side.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net>

Series applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/