[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150404152934.2db95051@lwn.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 15:29:34 +0200
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/memcg: update memcg/kmem status
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:17:17 +0300
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com> wrote:
> > So the text you've removed says not to select kmem support "unless for
> > development purposes." Do we now believe that this feature is ready for
> > use in a production setting? If the answer is "yes," I'd be happy to
> > take this through the docs tree.
>
> I added this warning because of the following issues, which made
> memcg/kmem useless:
>
> - no reclaim support
> - lack of memcg slab caches auto destruction
> - several obvious races/bugs
>
> They are all fixed now, so I think the answer is yes, it can be used in
> production. There might be bugs that I am not aware of, of course, but
> It must be safe to compile it in anyway, because memcg/kmem accounting
> is disabled by default and must be enabled explicitly at runtime by
> writing to cgroup/memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes.
So I believe you, but I'm still a bit nervous about taking this one
because I can't really judge whether we should be advising people to turn
on this feature at this point or not. A well-placed ack or two would
help there; otherwise, Andrew, if you think it makes sense, you can just
grab it :)
Thanks,
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists