[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150405050537.GA26390@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 07:05:37 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nohz: make nohz_full imply isolcpus
* Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com> wrote:
> On 4/4/2015 10:10 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >>Rik, what's the change you're proposing that's similar to this one? Thanks!
> >I don't have this particular one, and I like it.
> >
> >I know there are use cases where isolcpus= without
> >nohz_full= makes sense, but I cannot think of the
> >reverse.
> >
> >Acked-by: Rik van Riel<riel@...hat.com>
>
> Thanks, I'll push it via the tile tree unless someone would prefer otherwise.
Yes, I'd prefer otherwise: please send the final, agreed upon patch to
the timer tree.
> (The tick_nohz_full_set_cpus() and tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus()
> routines are in earlier tile tree commits, the latter supporting a
> change to the tile network driver.)
This is absolutely not OK, please push this through the timer tree. We
don't do generic timer changes through architecture trees.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists